7 Deadly Words
George Carlin had a routine
he did about the 7 words you can’t say on television, which prompted a Supreme
Court decision concerning First Amendment rights.
Under the current
administration we now have a list of 7 deadly words that are being struck out
of reports, erased from government websites. The forbidden words are:
"vulnerable," "entitlement," "diversity,"
"transgender," "fetus," "evidence-based" and
"science-based."
Specifically the CDC, Center
for Disease Control, the people who work to prevent the spread of Zika and bird
flu, who fight ebola—are being told what words they can and cannot use. In the
bigger scope of things I would much rather have people in place to react
aggressively against the plague than those same people worrying about or busy
cutting and replacing in their reports the word “fetus”. In ten years’ time
that fetus will thank you, for ignoring the list and simply doing your job.
I can’t imagine Trump made up
this list. I can’t imagine him even using the word vulnerable. No, this has
Mike Pence’s fingerprints all over it.
But let’s think about this
for a second. I’m a word person. Words mean a lot to me, and lately I’ve been
ravaged by words. Just the mention of certain words trigger something inside of
me.
What if we let them have “fetus”
if Trump promises not to grab pussy. What if we ban “pussy” from his
vocabulary? How about vulnerable, they can have it for the word “loser.” Trump
likes to Tweet that certain people are losers—let’s just put an X through that
one right now. He also overuses “weak” to describe those on his hit list. Hmmm
what if they were just vulnerable? If he gives us SAD we’ll toss out science-based.
Maybe use a euphemism for it like SB. Same thing with evidence-based. I mean
there will still be research, data that underlies decisions (I hope) so they
might want to consider some kind of shorthand. Besides is the White House actually reading these reports?
“Transgender” is a tricky
one. Are they saying there are no more transgendered, do they mean they don’t
exist? Or if they exist do we acknowledge them. Do we recognize the special
needs of any one group? Medical oversight of hormonal treatment programs,
gender reassignment surgeries will these be banned, how about stringent psychological
analysis that are used to deter rather than support or access patients with
gender dysphoria. Or maybe they might want to get rid of the word gender. We
can negotiate!
Terrific, amazing,
tremendous, bigly—you can have those if we get to keep diversity. Entitlement
is a head scratcher. I mean isn’t this latest tax bill—the one they’re trying
to push through Congress before the holiday break—isn’t that an entitlement for
the richest of the rich.
Here’s the rub: who gets to
define, who gets to say what words scientists can use, cite in their reports?
Republicans and Libertarians like to rant about governmental over-reach—isn’t
this an intrusion? A politicization of language?
I for one when the zombie flu
breaks out do not want to be quibbling about words while the CDC gets overrun
and the world wiped out by flesh-eating bacteria—or, yes, it could be 7 deadly
words.
Comments