If you say you are an artist, but you make little money from selling your art, can your work be considered a profession in the eyes of the Internal Revenue Service?
In a ruling handed down late last week by the United States Tax Court and seen by many as an important victory for artists, the answer is yes. The case involved the New York painter and printmaker Susan Crile, whose politically charged work is in the collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Guggenheim Museum and several other major institutions. In 2010, the I.R.S. accused Ms. Crile of underpaying her taxes, basing the case on the contention that her work as an artist over several decades was, for tax-deduction purposes, not a profession but something she did as part of her job as a professor of studio art at Hunter College.
The heart of the case touches on a situation familiar to many thousands of artists — from visual artists to musicians and actors — who earn a living as teachers or studio assistants or stagehands while pursuing creative careers that they hope will flourish and someday be able to pay the bills.
Really? The IRS is going after poor artists?
How about you--are you just a hobbyist? Read the rest here.
Meanwhile, I'm running a special starting Tuesday for Freeze Frame: How rto Write Flash Memoir. If you have friends who write or family interested in memoir, please, please, please Facebook them the link to my book. Again, the special begins Tuesday and it will go for 99 cents rather than $2.99--not that that is so bad either. --Since the IRS will be getting their share later.http://tinyurl.com/lkm3mke